Voting now open — Closes in 41 days Vote Now
Home Categories Shortlist Sponsors
Graepels

Graepels

4 projects shortlisted in 3 categories

Voting closes in 0d 00h 00m 00s

You can vote once in each category — so you can support Graepels in every category they're shortlisted in.

Initiatives – Innovation

All finalists in this category →

Architectural Metalwork – Façades

All finalists in this category →
Home of the Year
Finalist
Graepels

Home of the Year

Graepels

Graepels supplied architectural perforated metal elements for 13a Portobello, a contemporary infill home in Dublin 8. The perforated metal features play a key role in the building’s appearance and performance, providing privacy, light filtration and durability while creating a distinctive modern aesthetic. The project demonstrates how Irish-manufactured perforated metal can enhance residential architecture where space, light and design quality are critical.

Voting ID #22172
View
Pharmaceutical Company HQ, Dublin.
Finalist
Graepels

Pharmaceutical Company HQ, Dublin.

Graepels

Graepels designed and manufactured bespoke Picture Perf aluminium screens for a Pharmaceutical Company HQ, in Dublin. Featuring a Bandstand feature wall. Working alongside the architect, contractor and lighting specialists, the team transformed architectural imagery into illuminated perforated metal panels, creating a striking focal point that combines design, engineering, precision manufacturing and visual storytelling.

Voting ID #39155
View

Engineering & Fabricated Assemblies

All finalists in this category →
Woodbrook Train Station (DART)
Finalist
Graepels

Woodbrook Train Station (DART)

Graepels

Graepels developed a bespoke SafeDeck flooring system for Woodbrook Station’s pedestrian bridge, combining cambered galvanised panels, high-performance drainage and interchangeable ColourGrip nosings. Engineered for heavy public use and exposed rail conditions, the solution delivers exceptional slip resistance, maintainability, structural performance and visual clarity without compromising the bridge’s architectural design or passenger safety.

Voting ID #14172
View